<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fooling ReadyBoost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevex.net/2007/02/fooling-readyboost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevex.net/2007/02/fooling-readyboost/</link>
	<description>Software development and other notes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:03:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: inverted</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevex.net/2007/02/fooling-readyboost/comment-page-1/#comment-185309</link>
		<dc:creator>inverted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevex.net/index.php/2007/02/21/fooling-readyboost/#comment-185309</guid>
		<description>flash memory is 10x faster than disk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flash memory is 10x faster than disk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevex.net/2007/02/fooling-readyboost/comment-page-1/#comment-91439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevex.net/index.php/2007/02/21/fooling-readyboost/#comment-91439</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this- not that I want to fool Vista into slowing my machine down, but just because it&#039;s part of a related question I&#039;ve been seeking an answer for.

Does the ReadyBoost test compare the Flash device&#039;s performance against your actual existing hard drive speed?  Or does it just benchmark against some arbitrary &quot;standard&quot; value that Microsoft thinks is good?

I ask this because Vista on my machine rejects every USB Flash device I&#039;ve tried: they are all &quot;too slow&quot;.  I have a fast drive subsystem (two 10K RPM WD SATA 3 RAPTOR drives in a RAID 0 array) and 4 GB of RAM, so I could imagine a real test of the USB device versus my drives could lead to the &quot;too slow&quot; result.  Or it could just be that my USB interface and/or every Flash device I&#039;ve tested really *is* very slow.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this- not that I want to fool Vista into slowing my machine down, but just because it&#8217;s part of a related question I&#8217;ve been seeking an answer for.</p>
<p>Does the ReadyBoost test compare the Flash device&#8217;s performance against your actual existing hard drive speed?  Or does it just benchmark against some arbitrary &#8220;standard&#8221; value that Microsoft thinks is good?</p>
<p>I ask this because Vista on my machine rejects every USB Flash device I&#8217;ve tried: they are all &#8220;too slow&#8221;.  I have a fast drive subsystem (two 10K RPM WD SATA 3 RAPTOR drives in a RAID 0 array) and 4 GB of RAM, so I could imagine a real test of the USB device versus my drives could lead to the &#8220;too slow&#8221; result.  Or it could just be that my USB interface and/or every Flash device I&#8217;ve tested really *is* very slow.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

